Search for: "People v Booker"
Results 41 - 60
of 230
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2018, 12:59 am
Booker that the guidelines would only be advisory and not mandatory. [read post]
13 Nov 2018, 10:13 am
However, in 2005 the Supreme Court of the United States issued a ruling in United States v Booker that threw out the mandatory nature of sentencing guidelines. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 10:09 am
Senator Cory Booker and former Director of National Intelligence James R. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 6:18 am
In light of highly destructive recent court decisions like Shelby County v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 1:01 am
Supreme Court with District of Columbia v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 9:24 am
Booker that made those Guidelines advisory, not binding. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 3:52 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 4:49 am
Lacking the mad skillz of Yale law students to know with absolute certainty that the confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court means “people will die,” it seemed prudent to consider what Judge Kavanaugh had actually said or written in the past rather than to assume he would reverse Roe v. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:59 pm
Yet people in teeming communities often have no other choice. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Sellers, McCoy v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:34 am
v=UrtVZftjbhk. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 11:57 am
Booker to make the guidelines advisory. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 6:26 am
Under United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 11:20 am
Upon discovering Kurtzrock’s violation of Brady v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am
Booker when the Sentencing Guidelines were still mandatory. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:47 am
Just identifying all those relists on the court’s docket, and then figuring out the legal issues involved, was a big job for people who really do have other responsibilities. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 3:09 am
Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 11:07 am
& Annuity v. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 7:57 am
Booker, Johnson v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 4:32 am
Today’s second argument is in Ohio v. [read post]
