Search for: "People v Borden"
Results 41 - 60
of 67
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Borden was wrong and we were right to broaden the concept of confusion, but many things ignore that changes in the law move people’s perceptions as well. [read post]
22 Aug 2008, 11:11 pm
ENRON CORP. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 10:15 am
Borden, 7How. 1 (1849), when they ask for an advisory opinion, Hayburn’s Case, 2Dall. 409 (1792), see also Clinton v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 7:38 am
Canal Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 4:58 am
Dukes Wal-Mart v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 5:46 am
Peoples Baking Co., 187 S.C. 238, 196 S.E. 887 (1938) and McKenzie v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 9:30 am
One of those people, notably, was Barack Obama. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 1:21 pm
Robert Bone – Notice Failure and Defenses in Trademark Law Bone’s basic argument: Principal notice issue in TM is uncertainty about scope, and principal problem is chilling effects. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 12:01 pm
Borden , No. 08-1625 Sentence for drug crimes is affirmed where the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant a sentence reduction where: 1) defendant's sentence was appropriate based upon his extensive criminal history and the need to protect society; and 2) the court did not erroneously rely upon its earlier decision not to resentence defendant as a the basis for the present denial. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 3:00 am
(Spicy IP) Design v copyright: need for a clear and rational distinction: Microfibres v Giridhar & Co & Ors (Spicy IP) Madras High Court: jurisdiction - can design infringement case can be filed in Court where plaintiff resides? [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 9:50 am
(McKenna, 104-105) (quoting Rolex Watch U.S.A. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 7:15 am
State v. [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 4:00 am
Does any of them have a program the purpose of which is to solve the A2J problem that is the unaffordability of legal services for the majority of the population that is middle and lower income people? [read post]
23 Jan 2016, 10:50 am
Borden, Chief Justice Taney argued that the question of guarantee was inherently political and therefore was not justiciable. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm
Enfranchisement of Indigenous people did not fully occur until 1960. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 6:55 am
Under Article FIL 18, it is stated that: “local people’s governments at or above the county level (县级以上) may develop further foreign investment promotion and facilitation policies and measures within their existing statutory powers. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am
Three people who had ties to the organizations were later convicted of federal crimes. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 6:52 pm
Supreme Court in Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 12:33 pm
Frank points to Pagliolo v. [read post]
