Search for: "People v Christopher B."
Results 41 - 60
of 347
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2022, 5:54 pm
Organisations that do not act responsibly, posing risks to vulnerable people, or fail to meet ICO expectations will be investigated. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 3:47 pm
Pulsifer v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
The linchpin of Mostyn J’s conclusions in his recent series of judgments is (a) that the correct interpretation of Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417 is that financial remedy proceedings which are not concerned with child maintenance are and should always have been heard in public or as if in public, and (b) that, even if this is not right, the 2009 rule change which admitted accredited journalists to hearings of financial remedy proceedings rendered them public hearings. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 4:12 pm
This was, of course, the Act at issue in Monsanto v. [read post]
27 Aug 2022, 11:02 am
People can reach different conclusions. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:49 pm
: Linguistic Relativity and Its Implications for Section 230 and Copyright Christopher S. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:00 pm
Gobeille v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:00 pm
Gobeille v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:05 pm
In a seminal discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Brian Christopher Jones has written a fine book, Constitutional Idolatry and Democracy, which I have reviewed elsewhere. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:43 am
By way of context, before 2009 the only people who could attend hearings of this sort as of right were the parties and their lawyers. [read post]
26 May 2022, 4:16 am
About 150 people have been buried in a grave in one district, Haidai said, adding that the families of the people buried there will be able to carry out a reburial after the war. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm
Art, Music and Copyright The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has delivered judgment in C-433/20 Austro-Mechana, ruling that the notion of reproduction ‘on any medium’ extends to the cloud, and, therefore, that private copying under Article 5(2)(b) of the InfoSoc Directive also applies in that context. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:03 pm
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in West Virginia v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm
” Inforrm had an article on the new phenomenon of the “TikTok Tabloid,” which sets out how digital technologies are enabling a new form of social surveillance, and the impact this has on people’s private lives. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 9:12 pm
See Memorandum for Christopher H. [read post]
28 Nov 2021, 4:34 pm
Judgement was also handed down on meaning in Public Joint Stock Company Rosneft Oil Company v HarperCollins and Catherine Belthon [2021] EWHC 3141 (QB), the second libel claim to result from Putin’s People (above). [read post]
The court must consider the national security and public safety threats posed by concealable weapons
30 Oct 2021, 12:26 pm
Mary B. [read post]
