Search for: "People v Clayton" Results 41 - 60 of 447
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm by Karen Tani
Clayton County (2020) (holding that sexual orientation and gender identity discrimination violate Title VII), invoked the logic of Holcomb, as did the Seventh Circuit’s earlier opinion in Hively v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 3:29 am by SHG
Supreme Court’s 2020 ruling in Bostock v Clayton County, which held that Title VII’s ban on sex discrimination also extended to transgender and gay workers. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
The bill’s co-sponsors wrote a memo detailing the importance of the legislation, saying: In the landmark 2020 decision Bostock v. [read post]
4 Apr 2023, 4:33 am by Andrew Koppelman
Clayton County, that discrimination against LGBTQ people is illegal sex discrimination – a claim I’ve been making since I was a law student. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm by ccoleburn
In light of the Supreme Court’s 2020 decision in Bostock v. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
But most importantly, the individual investors – who former SEC Chairman Jay Clayton liked to call Mr. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Nine months ago, we wrote about a 20% shareholder, Alvin Clayton Fernandes, whose bare bones petition Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Frank P. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Koppelman
Clayton County rested on a defective understanding of causation: An employer who discriminates against LGBT people is not motivated by the employee’s sex, but rather by the employee’s sexual orientation. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
  JUNE The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, overturned Roe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 2:31 am by INFORRM
Australia On 14 December 2022, Judge Clayton handed down judgement in Hoser v Herald & Weekly Times [2022] VCC 2213. [read post]