Search for: "People v Clements"
Results 41 - 60
of 274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2022, 9:01 pm
The Court seemed to hold that in 1962, when it ruled in Engel v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
In Gray v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 9:30 pm
Yesterday the University at Buffalo Law School held the panel discussion “Sex, Solicitation, and the Supreme Court: Remembering People v. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 1:34 pm
Today, the Court heard argument in Kingsley v. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 1:39 pm
What the Chief Justice explained in the landmark Health-Care Cases (a/k/a NFIB v. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 8:12 am
StateLatest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:22 am
The Supreme Court will hear oral argument Wednesday in Pereida v. [read post]
2 Jan 2014, 9:59 pm
Bond v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 8:58 am
State * Latest Example of Social Networking Site Evidence Contradicting In-Court Testimony--People v. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
Before Tuesday’s oral arguments in American Broadcasting Companies v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 12:20 pm
It's unconstitutional under the First Amendment to require that people who circulate referenda petitions be eligible voters in the city (or other locality) in which the referenda is to be voted upon. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 3:20 pm
Clements v. [read post]
17 Sep 2016, 5:08 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:10 am
Just say any contract that any of these people sign in any of these fields is exempt. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 2:46 pm
In today’s case (Van v. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 2:19 pm
” Jeff Clements, general counsel of Free Speech for People, a public interest group devoted to overturning Citizens United, lauded the Montana high court’s opinion, writing, “Corporations are not people. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am
I have written elsewhere about how to make sense of the “racial v. political” dichotomy that that seems to trouble many people about Indian law. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:59 pm
[A famous line from NFIB v. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 7:19 am
Wickard v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:43 am
In his motion to dismiss in Pedersen v. [read post]
