Search for: "People v D.A."
Results 41 - 60
of 114
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2015, 11:30 am
The D.A. makes an offer of eight years. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 6:57 am
Moreover, people often have multiple motives for what they say. [read post]
23 Aug 2014, 11:46 pm
Ferguson himself: Ferguson v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 9:56 am
In the words of the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 4:47 am
Indeed, State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2014, 10:09 am
” (file name: Hooker D.A. [read post]
15 May 2014, 8:07 pm
Hayes v. [read post]
10 May 2014, 4:59 pm
Complying with the Supreme Court's dictates in Brady v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am
Given that Katz had already quoted the judge saying he was going to do exactly that — report him to the D.A. and Office of Professional Medical Conduct — it is bizarre to complain that I reported it. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 10:02 pm
Audits and inspections are never enough: A critique to enhance food safety 30.aug.12 Food Control D.A. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 12:12 pm
Whether we unconstitutionally target people for the death penalty is a nontrivial issue. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:22 pm
Lawrence v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 8:35 am
Lawrence v. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 6:43 pm
People v. [read post]
22 Oct 2013, 9:01 pm
The D.A. charged the men with transporting marijuana. [read post]
27 Sep 2013, 4:41 pm
In the case at bar, the criminal court assumes the most stringent standard in People v Vilardi, that is, the “reasonable possibility” standard to apply. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:07 pm
In People v Settles, it was held that this is impermissible. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 3:51 pm
In appropriate circumstances not only is the consent of the D.A. not required under CPL § 170.56 as it is generally required under the more general ACD provisions of CPL § 170.55 but the arrest itself is deemed a nullity based on the cases of People v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 6:19 am
Yesterday, in People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 5:26 pm
I’d love to hear from people who know more about this case. [read post]