Search for: "People v Das" Results 41 - 60 of 685
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
Attending Capita’s AGM, the campaigners called on the company’s Managing Director for Electronic Monitoring to watch and respond to recorded testimonies of people fitted by the surveillance devices. [read post]
11 May 2023, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
But that notion is inconsistent with the seminal compelled-speech case, Wooley v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 IPSO 11161-22 Park’s of Hamilton Limited v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of adjudication 11822-21 Law v express.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 02114-22 Bird v thesun.co.uk, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11120-22 Cozens-Hardy v The Daily Telegraph, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: publication of correction 11319-22 Maclennan… [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 5:01 am by Lee Kovarsky
The major point is this: Bragg is sketching a lot of different predicates involving a lot of different people. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:11 am
  “People v Donald ….mmm, hang on, how is that pronounced? [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 pm by John A. Emmons, Avery Schmitz
Robert Loeb provided a synopsis of Bahlul v. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 8:45 pm by Chijioke Okorie
But the majority of MPs (from the ruling party, African National Congress (ANC) supported the Bill and the Bill was accordingly passed.This two-part post reviews the MPs’ opposition to the CAB vis-à-vis the decision of the ConCourt in Blind SA v Minister for Trade, Industry and Competition. [read post]