Search for: "People v Dollar" Results 41 - 60 of 4,575
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2017, 4:34 pm
Someone steals something (a phone) that costs $900, but with sales tax, it would cost $972.Whether that's commercial burglary (a felony) or shoplifting (a misdemeanor) depends on whether  "the value of the property that is taken . . . exceed[s] nine hundred fifty dollars ($950). [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:54 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the event Defendant should wish to seek reclassification or to be relieved of any further duty to register under Correction Law § 168-o there apparently exists no record to permit adequate judicial review as held in People v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Even post-Civil War and post-Brown v. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 2:31 pm
Nor does the fact that the defendant has a grand total of $189 in cash in his entire house lead me to believe that he's the Arellano Felix of marijuana up there in Modoc County.Fifteen dollars worth of pot from a disabled Vietnam veteran. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 6:00 am by Martha Engel
  But what’s interesting about Apple v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 8:38 am
The Supreme Court today decided the case of Philip Morris v. [read post]
28 Aug 2012, 12:39 pm
 Your effort to cloak yourself in the Second Amendment to avoid this fate will completely fail.Two dollars to save five years. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 12:09 pm
Today's opinion decides who should possess a million-dollar car while the parties fight over whether it's stolen (probably not) or whether one of two different people legally own it.Brandon Lawrence says he validly bought the 1947 Cisitalia from a Japanese company who owned it. [read post]
26 Dec 2008, 12:21 pm
It's a decision that affirms a multi-million dollar civil penalty against corporate officials under the responsible corporate officer doctrine. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 11:22 am
”“Trap,” as a noun, means the daily dollar quota that a pimp sets for a prostitute. [read post]
14 May 2014, 10:49 am
 As well as an implicit threat.When the lender refused to give the Acostas the demanded ten thousand dollars to "maybe" vacate the premises, they deliberately destroyed the property. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
The Ninth Circuit panel substituted a new opinion in USA v Lazarenko, April 10, 2009. [read post]
24 Mar 2017, 2:30 pm by Daniela Alaattinoğlu
Moreover, the 50,000 US Dollars for damages is not that much more than the approximate 30,000 US Dollars that the Strasbourg Court has ordered the state to pay victims of involuntary sterilization (in 2011–12 cases V.C. v. [read post]