Search for: "People v Hamdy" Results 41 - 60 of 92
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Dec 2011, 1:48 pm by Steve Vladeck
A bit of background is in order before looking at how Congress addresses this question in the NDAA: Hamdi v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:29 am
  Today’s liberals and leftists might well also take exception to our defense of presidential executive power and unity, and to our criticisms of the Court’s impairment of presidential Commander in Chief Clause powers in the modern cases of Hamdi v. [read post]
3 Jan 2024, 5:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
As Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote for a plurality in Hamdi v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:19 pm by Alex Ely
We have held several American citizens for a multiple period of years as enemy combatants … Before I vote on your nomination, I want you to read Hamdi v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 4:35 pm
Yousuf (2010), on foreign sovereign immunities (posts here, here, and here), and Hamdi v. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 11:13 am by Jon Tracy
While the Courts imposed some rebukes on President Bush’s detention policy, in Hamdi v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 11:09 am by Nathan
  Fisher also said that Hamdi v. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 12:02 pm by Tom Goldstein
  That is what the Supreme Court said as well in Hamdi v. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
There's only 1 mention, at p. 66, of Johnson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm by Scott Bomboy
In 2004, Professor Eastman argued in a brief filed in Hamdi v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:26 pm by Erin Miller
”  Even though it is clear that Congress has the constitutional power to suspend the right of habeas corpus, Stevens insisted, in joining a dissent in Hamdi v. [read post]
Military detention may be legitimate for those captured on an actual battlefield, as our supreme court recognised in Hamdi v Rumsfeld. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 1:37 pm by Benjamin Wittes
” If these powers cover the capture and detention of people—like, say, Guantanamo detainees—they presumably give to Congress the power to require that those detainees be held at Guantanamo, rather than in some facility in the mainland. [read post]