Search for: "People v Lackey"
Results 41 - 60
of 69
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2009, 5:00 am
Stevens writing for himself and Breyer continued a theme started in his 1995 dissent to Lackey v. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 3:35 pm
A high court majority rejected Johnson's application for a stay of execution and his petition for review in which he raised the Eighth Amendment challenge.Justice John Paul Stevens, joined by Justice Stephen Breyer, dissented, saying Johnson’s situation was “as compelling a case” as he had encountered raising the constitutional concerns that Stevens himself raised in a 1995 dissent from another denial of certiorari: Lackey v. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
18 Apr 2009, 5:36 am
I do not know if these people are just stupid or merely lying. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 6:14 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 1:11 am
What I mean is, you remember yesterday where I asked a bunch of questions about that story where Mike Moore said he got a text message from Lon Stallings debunking Judge Lackey's testimony in the Jones v. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 8:32 am
"I of all people would not have anything to do with Steve Patterson," he noted. [read post]
16 Apr 2008, 1:44 am
Like the testimony by Judge Lackey yesterday about not being able to go to the Mississippi Attorney General's Office because, he was told, Jim Hood had buckled to pressure from Dickie Scruggs to cooperate in Scruggs' mass Katrina settlement with State Farm that netted the $26.5 million in fees at the core of the Jones v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:36 am
Lackey was assigned to a case called Jones et al v. [read post]
27 Mar 2008, 12:44 pm
Often these were people who were illiterate or uneducated. [read post]
21 Mar 2008, 9:49 am
The charge stems from a meeting on 3/15/07 where Zach, Dickie Scruggs, Backstrom, Patterson and Balducci met and discussed Balducci's relationship with Judge Lackey and at the meeting it was decided that Balducci would speak to Judge Lackey about making a favorable ruling for defendants in Jones v. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 10:19 am
Many people, after all, are arrogant -- lawyers, as a class, are plagued by a high percentage of people who are insufferably arrogant, vain and full of false notions about their own preeminence. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 9:51 am
DS hugging people who spoke, shaking hands, talking. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 6:42 am
Balducci’s involvement in the Jones v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:18 am
In my observation, other than the truly and incorrigibly stupid, no group of people is so prone to dumbness as smart people. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 6:27 am
I figured there would be a more complete story later, and I was right.This story, by Steve Korris of Legal Newsline, talks about a ruling by Judge Coleman, the new judge in the fee dispute case that led to the alleged plot to bribe Judge Lackey, Jones, Funderburg v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 1:44 am
In Arista v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 12:04 am
March 17 remains the last day for plea bargains in USA v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 12:14 am
Nationwide appeal, and who had a sharp exchange with William Walker, counsel for the policyholders, during oral argument last year in the Broussard v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 12:32 am
People keep saying that about me. [read post]
