Search for: "People v Lemon" Results 41 - 60 of 194
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2011, 8:04 am by Keith Lee
It’s an old saying about the effect of nature v. nurture. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 5:11 am
  Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] [noted by the IPKat here] established that, even if most people are not deceived, passing off can still be proved. [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
To identify people accessing Pedoboard, the FBI installed Network InvestigativeTechnique (`NIT’) software on the website, which revealed the true IP addresses of people accessing the site, the date and time the user accessed the content, and the user's computer operating system.U.S. v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
Yesterday, thirteen judges of the Fourth Circuit sitting en banc heard argument in IRAP v. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 4:10 am
James reminded us of Toth v Emirates [2012] EWHC 517 (Ch), which limited the scope for taking Nominet decisions before the courts for a judicial review [on which see brief Katnote here].Turning to passing off, the Advocaat, Jif Lemon, Henry vacuum cleaner, Moroccanoil, Swiss chocolate, the FAGE/Chobani Greek yoghurt and Vodkat decisions were also subjected to James' analysis. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
” This is the standard required by Lemon and elaborated upon in McCreary v. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 2:36 am
Scalia criticized the majority's Establishment Clause decision there as using the "formulaic abstraction" created in the Lemon case instead of "considering the long accepted practices of the American people. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
The Supreme Court granted certiorari in American Legion/Maryland National-Capital Park and Planning Commission v. [read post]
26 Jul 2019, 7:42 am by Mark Rienzi
This is not surprising, as the broader societal valence of religious-liberty conflicts has not abated, and many of the major precedents in the field (such as Lemon v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:27 am by Michael Stokes Paulsen
Alito, for a four-justice plurality – the majority minus Kagan – essentially repudiated the infamous “Lemon test” of 1971’s Lemon v. [read post]
2 Nov 2006, 11:04 am
Move over, Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:09 am by J. Michael Goodson Law Library
Justice Sotomayor is no stranger to the educational program's young viewers, having previously appeared earlier in 2012 to decide the case of Baby Bear v. [read post]
17 May 2015, 1:08 am
It is not sufficient that the repute would lead people in England to visit the venue when they visited Paris (Alain Bernardin et Cie v Pavilion Properties Ltd [1967] RPC 581). [read post]