Search for: "People v McDonald" Results 41 - 60 of 881
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Mar 2023, 9:08 am by Stephen Halbrook
Thompson/Center Arms Co., and has filed briefs in a vast number of other cases, including the NRA's party brief in McDonald v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
In December 2018, the directors learned that the company’s Global Chief People Officer, David Fairhurst, had allegedly engaged in an act of sexual harassment, the investigation of which uncovered that in 2016 the same individual had engaged in a prior incident of sexual harassment. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 5:21 pm by INFORRM
Canada On 15 February 2023, judgment was handed down in McDonald v Goranko, 2023 BCSC 231 (CanLII). [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 7:31 am
In his prior article, for example, Barnett concludes that originalism exerted an influence on McDonald v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 5:30 am by Katie Gu
The people have spoken through their elected representatives multiple times on this issue. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 11:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
Background From 2015 through his termination for cause in 2019, David Fairhurst served as Executive Vice President and Global Chief People Office of McDonald’s. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 1:11 pm by Michael Oykhman
Examples of acts which have, in the past, met the actus reus standard for a section 86 offence include: Storing a firearm in a glovebox (see: R v Patrick, 2007 CanLII 7579 (ONSC)) Storing a firearm in a dresser (see: R v McDonald, 2016 BCSC 1648 (CanLII)) Storing a firearm by a furnace (see: R v Roussel, 2014 ABQB 202 (CanLII)) The Guilty Mind (Mens Rea) The mens rea or the guilty mind speaks to the accused’s degree of intent during the argued commission of… [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 7:46 am by Stephen Halbrook
" In deciding that the Second Amendment applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment, the Court in McDonald v. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:43 am by Stephen Halbrook
The Supreme Court has since ruled that it does, in McDonald v. [read post]