Search for: "People v New York State Dept. of Corrections" Results 41 - 60 of 110
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm by Jeremy Saland
In People v.Drinkwine, 2016 NY Slip Op 6097 (2nd Dept. 2016), the defendant appealed from his plea to First Degree Scheme to Defraud (NY PL 190.65) and Third Degree Grand Larceny (NY PL 155.35). [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 8:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Those lower New York courts that have addressed the issue have uniformly applied the correct test. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 10:26 am by Donald Thompson
 In Handling a Criminal Case in New York § 23:35 [2013], Gary Muldoon notes that “[i]t is a basic tenet of appellate practice that it is improper for an attorney to argue matters that are dehors (outside) the record on appeal” (see also, e.g., People v Chiles, 70 AD3d 1453 [4th Dept 2010]). [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm by Guest Blogger
Anti-Discrimination Center of Metro New York v. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:07 am by Eric Turkewitz
If he gets caught in a lie on something that’s material at trial his future use to anyone is useless, correct? [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 2:56 pm by Stephen Bilkis
New York State Dept. of Correctional Servs., and People v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 3:30 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The clear and convincing evidence standard is an intermediate standard between the high standard of ‘beyond a reasonable doubt’ used in criminal proceedings and ‘fair preponderance ’ used in ordinary civil proceedings as held in Matter of New York City Dept. of Social Servs. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 4:15 pm by Sean Dugan
In New York, between 400 and 1000 voters were alleged to have voted once in New York and once in Florida. [read post]