Search for: "People v Plato"
Results 41 - 60
of 65
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2012, 9:30 am
Fisher v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 9:02 pm
Plato was not alone in assuming consent by silence. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Preamble Since the announcements of the iPhone and Microsoft's Surface (both in 2007), an especially large number of people have asked me about multi-touch. [read post]
28 Jul 2012, 6:41 am
As Plato said (paraphrasing Republic V:473-c): "until fiscal federalists make con law, or con law scholars study fiscal federalism, ... cities will never have rest from their evils. [read post]
15 May 2012, 6:41 am
– Plato As a law student or newly minted lawyer, you have utilized the Socratic Method to unravel mysteries such as discerning the rule of law we get from Pennoyer v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 11:00 pm
In Marbury v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:10 am
So too it can be said about the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo v. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm
“Plagiarism, which many people commonly think has to do with copyright, is not in fact a legal doctrine. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:51 pm
And to his order last week in State of Florida v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 4:39 am
Thrasymachus from Plato’s Republic would be impressed. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
The Constitution Bench of this Court in Gurbaksh Singh Sibbia and Others v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 7:27 am
Most seriously, he totally botches the description of an extremely important recent case, Chaoulli v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:26 am
I won't quite say that the brain-in-a-vat issue is exactly raised in the Supreme Court case of Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 9:15 am
Lewis v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 8:55 am
Constitutional amendments outside of Article V? [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 4:49 am
Co. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 4:31 am
” – Plato [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:09 am
§§ 525.070, 525.080; Speer v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:59 am
"Greenman v. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:55 pm
Judge Richard Posner used similar logic when penning the 7th Circuit’s 2001 decision in American Amusement Machine Association v. [read post]
