Search for: "People v Proper"
Results 41 - 60
of 7,014
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Oct 2022, 10:43 am
See People v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 12:21 pm
People v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 10:04 am
Maryland in 1819, pivot on Wickard v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 4:16 pm
People v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 12:49 pm
Why is it "proper" for a person driving a pre-1996 vehicle to wear only a lap belt but not "proper" for someone else? [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 4:57 am
by Jill Paperno, First Assistant Public Defender and author of Representing the Accused: A Practical Guide to Criminal DefenseAmong some of yesterday's disappointing Court of Appeals decisions there is one that can be useful to us - People v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Clancy v. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 1:52 pm
And when the officer went up to the car and smelled alcohol, and eventually arrested the guy for DUI, that was all good and proper. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
Some of us are old enough to remember the commercial about the stockbroker company which was, in substance, when X talks people listen. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:25 am
As the Court explained in United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 9:31 am
The First Department, citing People v Reason, 37 NY2d 351 [1975], stated that this was not a proper basis upon which to deny the defendant's request. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:50 pm
The cases of People v Reed and People v Boscic held that the statute differentiates between a preliminary field test and a chemical breath test, which is admissible at trial with the laying of a proper foundation. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
In 1992, in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 8:35 pm
Or, just maybe, the incredibly dry and complicated topic of the opinion, which involved a fact-specific calculation of the defendant's proper sentence.But, whatever the reason, I can honestly say that I found myself occasionally thinking: "I can barely even follow what the scoop is here. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
Our discussion of the People v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 9:31 am
Frierson (1991) 53 Cal.3d 730, 740, 742), as may one made four days before trial is to begin (People v. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 12:02 pm
The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 1:49 pm
In People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 4:56 pm
The Individual Mandate, Sovereignty, and the Ends of Good Government: A Reply to Professor Randy Barnett Patrick McKinley Brennan Villanova University School of Law University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2011 Abstract:Randy Barnett has recently argued that the individual mandate is unconstitutional because it is an improper regulation under the Necessary and Proper Clause (in conjunction with the Commerce Clause) because it improperly "commandeers" the people and thereby… [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 2:00 pm
Maurer v. [read post]
