Search for: "People v Steven A. Domin"
Results 41 - 60
of 173
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2020, 3:57 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 6:30 am
The speculators in Fletcher v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 3:40 am
” Dominic Holden reports at BuzzFeed.News that the court “won’t hear a case from gun rights activists challenging a federal ban on bump stocks, which were prohibited after being used in a 2017 Las Vegas shooting where 58 people were killed. [read post]
21 Dec 2019, 6:07 pm
See Koch v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm
His case, Marbury v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Stephen Budiansky concerning Budiansky’s book “Oliver Wendell Holmes: A Life in War, Law, and Ideas” (W.W. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 4:43 pm
The discussion in 2013 was dominated by the Leveson Report and the debate about its implementation. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:00 pm
Several people who read my submitted statement found Michael’s material as fascinating as I did, so I have added it to my less-than-five-minute opener. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 12:15 pm
A review of Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt, How Democracies Die (Crown, 2018). *** I What does the twilight of modern democracy look like? [read post]
28 Aug 2018, 8:13 am
Segregationist senators dominated the hearings. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
The figure looks at which issues, as coded in the Supreme Court Database, dominated these decisions (based on issues that appeared in at least two such decisions). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 7:20 am
Roe v. [read post]
2 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm
Less broadly, Justice John Paul Stevens infamously “failed the First Amendment” with his dissenting 1989 vote that would have allowed governments to ban flag burning, a view that he did not change in subsequent years.The point is that finding exceptions to rules does not mean that there are no rules. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in Hawaii v. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 10:00 am
Case citation: Stevens v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:27 am
That question used to dominate discussions within legal academia. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
The (in)famous Bush v. [read post]
