Search for: "People v Vidal"
Results 41 - 60
of 81
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2009, 3:50 am
In Keating v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:18 am
Lloyd made the claim on behalf of a class of more than 4 million Apple iPhone users, seeking a finding as to entitlement to recover compensation on behalf of all those people ([13]); the compensation would have amounted to £750 per person, at a cost of almost £3 billion to Google. [read post]
21 Jul 2015, 2:30 am
Since then, the picture has changed somewhat in relation to both Article 8 and the Data Protection Act: news organisations have raised concerns about the treatment of online search results, following the ECJ’s decision in Google Spain SL and Google Inc. v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD) and Mario Costeja González; the relationship between data protection and journalism was addressed in Steinmetz and others v Global Witness Limited; misuse… [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:45 am
Just over a week before the Court released Rahimi, it released Vidal v. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 4:32 pm
In Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. ([2015] EWCA Civ 311) the Court of Appeal held that there can be a claim for compensation under the Data Protection Act without pecuniary loss and that misuse of private information is a tort, not an equitable wrong. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 8:06 am
Under that program, DHS would refrain from taking immigration actions against people brought to the country as children, and those people would be eligible for work permits. [read post]
16 May 2019, 7:55 am
The way things are going, many people can’t even seek comfort in simple escapism. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 2:17 pm
Vidal case out of New York City, one of several consolidated cases before the justices today. [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm
The judge said that it was “of regret when people in public office comment about a person who is involved in a trial which is in progress”. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 8:26 am
In Moyle v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:10 pm
Vidal 23-135Issue: Whether 35 U.S.C. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 5:09 pm
On 2 and 3 March 2015, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Mcfarlane and Sharp LJJ) will heard the appeal in the case of Vidal-Hall v Google. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 10:52 pm
By contrast, courts in California and Canada have found a contractual jurisdiction and applicable law clause invalid as a matter of public policy in order to allow a class action privacy claim to proceed against Facebook.[6] In England, the dual challenge of jurisdiction and collective actions in a mass privacy infringement claim has presented itself before the English Courts, first in Vidal-Hall v Google before the Court of Appeal in 2015[7] and in the Supreme Court judgment of… [read post]
The Data Protection Act: a stone to sling at the Facebook Goliath? – Rhory Robertson and Sophie Pugh
28 Jul 2014, 5:10 pm
Following the recent decision in Vidal-Hall v Google Inc. ([2014] EWHC 13 (QB)), it seems that the English Courts are looking more favourably on applications of English Claimants to invoke (or invite) the jurisdiction of the English Courts to hear cases in this “developing area” of law. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 6:34 am
Multiplied by the number of people whom Mr. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 11:37 am
The case of Vidal Sassoon, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 3:32 pm
These guidelines largely follow the Federal Circuit’s holding in Thaler v. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 11:31 am
Speculation that Justice Barrett was moving away from that approach, based on her Vidal v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:21 am
Ramos v. [read post]
