Search for: "People v Warren" Results 41 - 60 of 963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ct. 1731, 1755 (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting) (statutory words “mean what they conveyed to reasonable people at the time they were written” (citation omitted)); Kisor v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Then, too, he was afraid people would read his work as a commentary on the Warren Court. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 12:50 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
  This is also the underlying constitutional question in the Supreme Court's Moore v. [read post]
21 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
If the battle to root out racial prejudice in capital cases is ever to be won, it will require that we not turn a blind eye to cases like Warren King’s.That case also offers the Court a chance to send a clear message about the seriousness with which it takes violations of its 1986 Batson v. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in an IJ case, DeVillier v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 7:54 am by Josh Blackman
On December 6, the Colorado Supreme Court heard oral argument in Griswold v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 9:22 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Finally, SOC was not adverse to delving into casual cruelty toward Indian people. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:45 pm by Legal Aggregate
(I had met previously with Justice Warren Burger and recall also thinking that her questions were more intelligent than his.) [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am by Amy Howe
In 2013, O’Connor told the Harvard Business Review that her experience as a legislator taught her to “work with people because you want to have as many on board for your position as you can. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Senate President Warren Petersen and Speaker Ben Toma both said they would comply. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 5:51 am by Elizabeth Goitein
” In fact, while four district court judges and the FISA Court have found backdoor searches to be constitutionally reasonable, four circuit court judges — including a unanimous Second Circuit panel in United States v. [read post]