Search for: "People v. Alfreds"
Results 41 - 60
of 200
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
24 Jul 2021, 11:51 am
”[6] Although any actual apportionment, upon which reasonable people can disagree, must be made by the trier of fact, whether the plaintiff’s harm is apportionable is a question for the court.[7] Judicial Applications of Apportionment Principles Some of the earliest cases apportioning property damages involved the worrying and killing of sheep by dogs belonging to two or more persons. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
Alfred Avins published The Reconstruction Amendments’ Debates: The Legislative History and Contemporary Debates in Congress on the 13th, 14th, and 15th Amendment in 1967. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 6:30 am
” Professor Avins and the Commission were convinced that Brown v. [read post]
27 May 2021, 8:27 am
Specifically, the case of Alfred Lawson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 12:10 pm
In 2002, the Supreme Court ruled in Atkins v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 6:31 pm
The Supreme Court ruled in 2002 in Atkins v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 1:28 pm
" Alfred L. [read post]
30 Nov 2020, 9:29 am
Alfred A. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 10:25 am
Alfred E. [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 6:53 pm
" So she told the story of Weinberger v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 6:02 am
Before Brown v. [read post]
28 Jul 2020, 5:00 am
Alfred H. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 10:14 am
Surveys, testimony, observing online behavior are all different sources of empirical evidence: searches originating on Amazon v. searches originating on Google. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 9:00 am
Panel 3: CopyrightSarah Polcz, Loyalties v. [read post]
30 Dec 2019, 5:02 am
Alfred A. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm
Bickel’s account – essentially, to emphasize the principles underlying the 14th Amendment and its capacity for growth, rather than how people at the time understood it – is of a piece with one of the ways originalists try to save their approach from generating unacceptable conclusions. [read post]
