Search for: "People v. Atkin" Results 41 - 60 of 263
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm by INFORRM
” This provision was to be interpreted in the light of the common law background, which the Supreme Court summarised as follows [6-7]: “[A] working definition of what makes a statement defamatory, derived from the speech of Lord Atkin in Sim v Stretch [1936] 2 All ER 1237, 1240, is that “the words tend to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 8:54 am by John Elwood
Most people feel so strongly about the issue that they can’t unwind their views of the law from their personal beliefs. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 8:51 am
Both times she told her manager what she had done.But this wasn't good enough for two of Dollar General's higher-up management people, Scott Strange, a district manager, and Matt Irwin, a regional loss prevention manager. [read post]
30 May 2018, 1:15 pm
In 1880, for example, it outlawed the categorical exclusion of Black people from juries in Strauder v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am by Andrew Hamm
People really have adapted to it and laboratories have found their own solutions. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:14 pm by Brian Stull
It rejected other non-scientific factors often employed to deny claims of intellectual disability under Atkins v. [read post]