Search for: "People v. Billings"
Results 41 - 60
of 9,438
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jul 2022, 7:24 pm
The bill anticipates the overturning of these decisions, as signaled by Justice Clarence Thomas in his concurrence in Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 11:31 pm
But the more people who learn about law-making, the more people will participate in the process and the less likely we will have problems like this:From Powers v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 11:44 am
I prefer that my doctor not fraudulently bill Medi-Cal. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 5:47 am
When he began this work, Bill would frequently say “indigenous people — that’s ME! [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 7:04 am
Billed v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 6:31 am
Effective immediately, the bill amends G.S. 15A-2005, which makes intellectually disabled (formerly, mentally retarded) people ineligible for the death penalty. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:17 pm
This indicates that people who are attracted to law because of its status would also be prepared to commit minor frauds. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 6:30 am
Writing for the Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 2:55 pm
(People v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 10:48 am
The Supreme Court of California ruled that balance billing is not allowed in the state in Prospect Health Source Medical Group, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 12:59 pm
Lamoreaux gets 25 to life.Still long, but better than LWOP.Then the Legislature passes Senate Bill 1437, which allows people sentenced to murder who weren't the "actual killer" to apply for resentencing. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 9:25 am
The case is People v. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 10:12 am
From Usefully Employed (hat-tip) comes the news that the consultation on the Equality Bill proposes the introduction of indirect discrimination as a category, which would help with the horlicks that the Lords made of the 1995 Act in Malcolm v Lewisham: [the Bill shall] adopt the concept of indirect discrimination for the purposes of the disability discrimination provisions in the Equality Bill, rather than carry forward to the Equality Bill the existing… [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 7:42 pm
Supreme Court case Riley v. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 6:52 am
Case citation: Fyk v. [read post]
6 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
As the SCC stated in Ontario v. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 3:39 am
AI should: (i) comply with equalities legislation; (ii) be inclusive by design; (iii) not discriminate unlawfully or perpetuate such discrimination from “input” data; (iv) meet the needs of those from lower socio-economic groups, older people and disabled people; and (v) generate data that is findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable. [read post]
2 Aug 2017, 8:26 am
Further, the bill sends a clear message to Iran and North Korea that the American people will not tolerate their dangerous and destabilizing behavior. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 8:10 am
See United States v. [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 8:14 am
Rumsfeld v. [read post]
