Search for: "People v. Carter (1995)" Results 41 - 60 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Aug 2012, 6:05 am
"), with Carter, 525 U.S. at 99 (Kennedy, J., concurring) ("The Fourth Amendment protects '[t]he right of the people to be secure in their ... houses,' and it is beyond dispute that the home is entitled to special protection as the center of the private lives of our people. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am by Ronald Collins
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 4:02 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
Courts have precluded the use of class actions against drug makers in most cases (see, e.g., Valentino v. [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 9:44 am by Brian Shiffrin
Only the Appellate Division, First Department (People v Graham, 211 AD2d 55, 57-58 [1st Dept 1995] lv denied 86 NY2d 795 [1995]) correctly applied the Court's holding that was adverse to the prosecution.After years of its decision in Stith being ignored, the Court in People v Hunter (2011 NY Slip Op 04542 [6/2/11]) finally reminded courts that they are bound to follow its decision in Stith. [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 8:05 pm
Reagan, and 57 percent of those named by President Jimmy Carter). [read post]
12 May 2010, 4:10 pm by Sandy Levinson
As everyone now knows, Elena Kagan is fully aware of this scandal, having written about it in a 1995 review of Steve Carter's The Confirmation Mess. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm by Tom Goldstein
In a 1995 review of Stephen Carter’s book on confirmation hearings, “Confirmation Messes, Old and New,” Kagan criticized senators for failing to ask, and nominees for refusing to answer, questions about their views on specific issues. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 12:21 am
Keisler, which had been in litigation since 1995, Kamins said. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:38 am
The General Assembly is now weighing in on the Court of Appeals ruling in Bruce Jones v. [read post]