Search for: "People v. Coke" Results 41 - 60 of 250
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2014, 9:38 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  What is Coke saying its compliance is? [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 7:05 am
The SCC will review whether the court erred in reversing the acquittal at trial.Read the Manitoba Court of Appeal’s decisionRelated news article:Big coke bust ends in acquittal, Winnipeg Free PressJan. 23 to 24 — Nova Scotia — R. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
It's about setting out the law that governs the people. [read post]
27 Dec 2013, 1:10 pm
 As in selling nearly a billion dollars of coke. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 10:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Any general claims about distinctiveness must take into account: eligibility for protection/scope of protection; reality v. policy; words v. non-words; perception by single consumers v. aggregate; consumer search costs approach v. product goodwill approach; US v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:09 am by Dianne Saxe
 The plaintiffs alleged that the two governments, by owning and operating these facilities between 1967 and 2000, caused or permitted the emission of contaminants on nearby people and property. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 10:08 am
Elliott's claim are undeniable - people do actually use the verb “to google”. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 10:36 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Coke would still say “you want Coke, not some other soda. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:44 pm
Article V of our Constitution allows a Convention to be called for the purpose of proposing Amendments to it, and not for rewriting it totally. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 5:08 pm
Those are indeed the people who hostis humani generis. [read post]