Search for: "People v. Comstock" Results 41 - 60 of 158
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2012, 1:22 pm by WIMS
"     Schneiderman said, "This is a landmark victory for New Yorkers, and people across the country living in the shadows of nuclear power plants. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Edward A. Fallone
My response to that is to quote Justice Holmes in Lochner v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 8:40 am by Big Tent Democrat
Comstock, the Court said: The question presented is whether the Necessary and Proper Clause, Art. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:25 am
 Under such a principle, if Congress simply wants to encourage market activity, it must use prohibitions of the Wickard v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 11:50 am by JB
Note, by the way, that if fewer people buy cars, the price of cars might go down, not up, as Justice Scalia thought.Closest analogy: In United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2012, 9:30 pm
 But evaluated through the political frame of Bush v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:48 pm by Randy Barnett
 And, although I hoped against hope that Judge Silberman was not telegraphing his position when he strongly asserted that the “logic” of Wickard v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 1:22 pm by WIMS
In its rush to regulate, EPA has failed in its responsibilities to the American people by jeopardizing the foundation of our economy. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 12:28 pm by WIMS
NE, Comstock Park, MI 49321-9537 Phone: 616-647-2186 E-Mail: jd@ecobizport.com URL: http://www.ecobizport.com BLOG: http://enewsusa.blogspot.com/ [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 1:17 pm by WIMS
NE, Comstock Park, MI 49321-9537 Phone: 616-647-2186 E-Mail: jd@ecobizport.com URL: http://www.ecobizport.com BLOG: http://enewsusa.blogspot.com/ [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
      Environmental organizations argue that according to the Clean Air Act -- and reinforced by a 2001 Supreme Court decision in Whitman v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am by John Mikhail
It also is the ultimate ground of the Court’s holding in McCulloch v. [read post]