Search for: "People v. Dick"
Results 41 - 60
of 314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court has, in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
17 Jul 2021, 4:38 am
Clearly, she knows how to persuade people to come to her side with her deep and thoughtful political arguments. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 10:25 am
In Miami Herald v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 8:43 am
Dick Durbin, D-Ill. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 9:01 am
Case citation: People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 9:13 am
In his first weeks in office, President Biden issued several executive actions focused on reevaluating and unwinding the panoply of protectionist immigration policies former President Trump set in place through executive branch action. [read post]
9 Jan 2021, 5:37 pm
Dept. of Ins. v. [read post]
2 Dec 2020, 2:45 am
In McNally v. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Richard Kopf Why CLS proves that Buck v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:39 pm
Vance and Trump v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 10:35 pm
Roe v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 3:30 am
Dean Scott begins her article with a discussion of Renchard v. [read post]
6 May 2020, 12:01 pm
Dick Durbin in mid-March, would amend the Senate rules to allow senators to vote remotely using any technology certified as “reliable and secure” by the secretary of the Senate, sergeant-at-arms and director of the doorkeepers if the Senate majority and minority leaders or their designees jointly determine that “an extraordinary crisis of national extent exists in which it would be infeasible for Senators to cast their votes in person. [read post]
15 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
A couple of decades later, in Jacobson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 7:08 am
Unlike any of my prior writings, the book is intended for a popular audience: people intrigued by how the Supreme Court decides cases as well as people who care deeply about the climate issue. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 8:43 pm
[This is a version of a letter I sent to the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property today to call attention to various discrepancies in the proposed witness list, especially the presence of the Pirate Party at a hearing at the world’s greatest deliberative body. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:52 pm
Some people think the House could have won more help from the courts, but this was pure speculation. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 5:00 am
I arrived to NFIB v. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 10:31 am
The Supreme Court made this clear in its 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]
