Search for: "People v. Duane" Results 41 - 60 of 108
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2017, 4:45 am by SHG
That means you’ve got to shut down your phone, leave your office and meet people outside the office, perhaps by volunteering, joining a group like Rotary, or through bar work. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
Yesterday the justices heard argument in Dean v. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 10:18 pm by Jason
Duane Morris also reports about a Massachusetts case, DeGiacomo v. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am by Edith Roberts
Davis, which will also be argued next week, “the case of Texas death row inmate Duane E. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 5:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Boundary crossing: sharing research w/community at large v. within the pharma co. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am by Chris Castle
Hesse came up with this all on her own, so I asked myself how did this person end up being in the position she is currently in with the authority to do so much damage to so many people who don’t deserve it. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 9:32 am by John Elwood
Monday’s order list brought good news for the petitioners in two of last week’s relists (with correspondingly bad news for the people on the other side of the “v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 10:41 am by Lyle Denniston
  He said flatly that his studies had shown that black people and males were more likely to be a danger to the public. [read post]
19 Apr 2016, 3:27 am by Amy Howe
Texas in the end”; and Lisa Soronen, who at the NCSL Blog notes that the case “is about different things for different people. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
But we don’t just use the internet to transmit stuff about goods/things people have legal rights in. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
As Father Duane would say, “Dude! [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm by Eric Turkewitz
Rakofsky sued so many people and companies that discussed what happened that the suit was instantly dubbed Rakofsky v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:51 pm by Donald Thompson
 The proscription in the title or this post is slightly more limited (federal agents) and based not on the Constitution, but on a particular federal statute: 18 USC § 1001.In New York, for example, the police are permitted to lie to you (“we got your fingerprints on the murder weapon,” “we've got a video of you leaving the 7-11,” “your codefendant is saying it was all you, he didn’t do anything,”) in order to get you to tell the truth, so long… [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Administrator
Sweeney, she said, “Unless your language arts teacher wants to have people speak only when they’ve completely ‘rehearsed’ what to say (as in a play), he will need to allow the children to pause within their turns. [read post]