Search for: "People v. Edge"
Results 41 - 60
of 1,281
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2016, 4:03 am
In the case of Armes v Nottinghamshire County Council [2016] EWHC 2864 (QB) Males J held that the right of a claimant to name the people who abused her prevailed over the rights of the perpetrators and others to private and family life. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Colleen V. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:38 am
See, e.g., Paul v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 8:26 am
By Eric Goldman People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 7:05 am
We hate to admit it… but winter is edging closer and closer every day. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 1:30 pm
Doe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 3:33 am
The consolidated cases decided this week by the Michigan Supreme Court, known as People v Carp, et al, squarelyaddressed the narrow issue of whether the SCOTUS ruling in Miller should be applied retroactively.If Miller's ban on mandatory life sentences for juveniles is applied retroactively, then the 350 juvenile lifers in MDOC prisons would have a shot at parole. [read post]
17 Nov 2011, 9:06 am
Does incumbency matter, since incumbents already have an electoral edge? [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 10:11 am
It’s fairly well-accepted that pretty people have an edge – greater popularity, higher grades, more job opportunities, more positive reviews, higher salaries – they’re even punished less harshly by the criminal justice system for the same crimes as people generally deemed less attractive. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 1:03 am
" In ICAN Enterprise, Inc. et al v. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 5:59 pm
In fact, that is the exact situation of United States v. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:16 am
Brain injury lawyer explains how Krohn v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 8:31 am
Wood v. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm
" When defense counsel asked that prospective juror whether she would "tend to give the——the cop the edge on who's telling the truth," she responded, "I would lean that way, yes. [read post]
27 Oct 2017, 7:03 am
Previously the test for “dishonesty” laid down in R v Ghosh [1982] QB 1053 required the prosecution to prove (1) that the actions of the defendant were dishonest by the lay objective standards of ordinary, reasonable and honest people and (2) that the defendant must have realised that ordinary honest people would regard his behaviour as having fallen below those standards. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 4:00 am
I suggest it’s all the people. [read post]
6 Dec 2014, 7:43 am
In TEI v. [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 2:54 am
The Supreme Court considered the test for dishonesty and concluded that the second leg of the test propounded in R v Ghosh does not correctly represent the law and directions based upon it ought no longer to be given. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:59 am
However, the accident did injure the driver, who reportedly fell asleep behind the wheel, and came perilously close to injuring two people asleep inside a motor home parked at the edge of the lot. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:48 am
As a followup on the interrelationship of KSR v. [read post]
