Search for: "People v. Felt" Results 41 - 60 of 3,293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2024, 2:21 am by David Pocklington
The statement of need includes anecdotal information that the Minister of the Baptist congregation, “one of several people who have previously tripped over the legs on the current long benches owing to their awkward design”. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:02 am by Beatrice Yahia
Sahil Kapur and Frank Thorp V report for NBC News. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am by Adam Ziegler
On my left: the edge of the off-ramp, a modest guardrail, and a fifty-foot drop. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am by Don Chen
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 10:59 am by Thorin Klosowski
The NSA has a long history of spying on Americans, but we hadn't gotten to Jewel v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm by Will Baude
But at least listen when I say this: There are lots of people, and even lots of law students, outside the bubble. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
As Purcell recounts, the Taft Court understood itself as an unmediated channel for the values and mores of the American people. [read post]
24 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Insofar as Post felt any need to comply with some Holmes Devise obligation to produce a “history of record,” he does so indirectly by supplementing his text with exceptionally voluminous footnotes that amplify and extend his thematic discussions. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 4:38 pm by Andrew Crocker
EFF felt that these guidelines could have gone further, but we held out hope that they would do some work in protecting people from overbroad use of the CFAA. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Much of the evidence I discuss here has been ignored or overlooked in the existing scholarship on Section Three, and most of it does not appear in any of the briefs in Trump v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Ct. 1731, 1755 (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting) (statutory words “mean what they conveyed to reasonable people at the time they were written” (citation omitted)); Kisor v. [read post]