Search for: "People v. Finely" Results 41 - 60 of 5,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2016, 12:27 am by INFORRM
In the case of Bédat v Switzerland  ([2016] ECHR 313) the Grand Chamber overturned the Chamber’s decision and reached the surprising conclusion that the conviction and fine imposed on the applicant journalist for publishing a public interest story containing information covered by the secrecy of criminal investigations did not constitute a violation of his Article 10 rights. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:12 pm
  Even though the evidence may be fairly strongly one way, the People are still entitled to a trial. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:47 pm
Something to which I can personally attest, having been held up at gunpoint myself in that fine locale (albeit not at a fast food joint).As far as I -- or anyone else -- can tell, Gilbert Vasquez and his fellow gang members killed Juan Lopez, without word or provocation, solely because they mistakenly thought he was a member of another gang. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:19 pm
 Increased pressure on both in order to avoid a collision after all.That can't be right.I admit that there's a fine line between assault and battery. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 4:45 pm
A fine is unconstitutionally excessive if it “notably exceeds in amount that which is reasonable, usual, proper or just” (People v Saffore, 18 NY2d 101, 104 [1966]). [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 2:56 pm by Heather Donkers
Heather’s Legal Summaries: The case of R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58Victim Fine Surcharges Today, the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision in four cases, heard together as R v Boudreault, 2018 SCC 58. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
The Court of Appeal is pretty much fine with that.At the same time, we don't allow officers to tell the jury that, in their opinion, the defendant is guilty given the evidence against him. [read post]
10 May 2013, 12:42 pm
I think it should be just fine in a case like that for the court to include as part of its sentence that the defendant have no further contact with the victim. [read post]