Search for: "People v. Finger"
Results 41 - 60
of 819
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2019, 8:56 am
In particular, the magistrate judge relied on the Supreme Court’s recent landmark decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 9:00 pm
Based on the decision in U.S. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:19 am
Diamond v. [read post]
16 Dec 2021, 3:32 pm
" Boxill v. [read post]
26 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm
A police officer cannot, for example, look at a suspect’s fingers and say “Wow! [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 4:22 pm
People v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
Love v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 10:00 pm
On April 29, 2016, the Alabama Court of Civil Appeals released its opinion in Leesburg Yarn Mills, Inc v. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 5:06 am
There is nothing in Roe v. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:37 pm
These cases are reviewed below: People v Newton, 2007 NY Slip Op 03754 - "No Means No" The defendant was charged with, inter alia, sodomy in the third degree (Penal Law § 130.40[3]). [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 12:10 pm
As onlookers pass by, the officer may “‘feel with sensitive fingers every portion of [your] body. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 7:37 am
Our Fort Lauderdale defense attorneys know this was the core issue in People v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 6:50 pm
Regardless of the fact that there may well be lots of people named "Jose A. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:02 am
"From an answer to the question how did people cut their finger- and toenails before the invention of the nail clipper. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:25 pm
At trial, Carpenter was fingered as the mastermind of robbery scheme by seven of his alleged accomplices. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 12:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 8:17 am
Unfortunately for them, in Gubala v. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
Hammon v. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
Preamble Since the announcements of the iPhone and Microsoft's Surface (both in 2007), an especially large number of people have asked me about multi-touch. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 1:41 am
While Congress has bickered and blathered, the least democratic branch has done much of the work of the people, stepping in with a series of landmark patent rulings that have undermined the excessive clout wielded by patent holders, with rulings that strip them of the automatic right to shut down their rivals' businesses when they infringe (eBay v MercExchange, 2006) and tighten the standard for proving that an invention deserves patent protection in the first place (KSR… [read post]
