Search for: "People v. Foote" Results 41 - 60 of 1,672
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
  In defining that test, the Supreme Court in Joseph relied heavily on the decision of the House of Lords of Kemsley v Foot [1952] A.C. 345. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
But I'd bet my left foot that the police got there really quickly after chasing the guy at 100 mph for a little over a mile, and even if the guy testified that he intended to call in the accident (which he didn't), I'd bet my entire set of feet on the fact that he wasn't telling the truth and that he deliberately fled in a (continuing) attempt to get away.But, hey, at this point, Part III is unpublished, and -- as I noticed at the time -- the guy's… [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am by Will Baude
"  Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
 This freedom to speak against the government and government officials is essential in a free society committed to the preeminence of the people. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 10:46 am by Frank O. Bowman, III
Republican politicians have embraced immigration as a potent political issue. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
I'm certain that there are many people who would categorically agree with Justice Poochigian when he says in this opinion:"The interests of justice are not furthered by excluding truthful, relevant evidence needed to prosecute criminals. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
NetChoice claims that it has an unbridled right to censor or otherwise discriminate against other peoples’ speech. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am by Eric Goldman
Or, in the terms that the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has used, there is no “bait and switch” where Peninsula is trying to get its foot in the door because Peninsula has already gotten its foot in the door by the fact that the consumer is on Peninsula’s website. [read post]