Search for: "People v. Gist" Results 41 - 60 of 320
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2022, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
The gist of the complaint was that the Claimant had used her personal Twitter account to publish articles and information critical of the Conservative Government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:57 am by Peter Mahler
Here’s the gist of its discussion on that point: [I]n explaining that it would not apply a reduction in value for lack of control and marketability, the trial court observed that “[s]uch a reduction would only make sense if plaintiffs were selling their shares to some third-party purchaser. [read post]
11 Oct 2021, 1:13 pm by Eugene Volokh
The privilege exists because people need to be free to discuss formal allegations made in official court proceedings being considered by governmental actors. [read post]
4 Apr 2021, 10:49 am by Eugene Volokh
Rather, the claim seems to me that he was in the same building and thus likely to be passing closely by employees on various occasions (coming to and from work or to and from lunch, meeting with people, and so on). [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 9:07 pm
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 2:00 am
And in turn, that invalidity taints the vote in the Electoral College, by mingling invalid votes with valid ones.As Justice Marshall famously stated in Marbury v. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
But even the statements that erroneously said the D.A.'s office was involved are likely don't change the gist of the allegation. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:06 am by Jane Turner
Her shows had 250,000 people in the audience and 600,000 podcast downloads per month. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 11:34 am by Sam Brunson
(It’s more complicated than that, of course, but that’s the general gist.) [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
The basic gist of the settlement is a default of nondiscrimination in public accommodations and employment, with extensive exemptions for those who object on religious grounds to employing or providing services to LGBTQ people. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Dworkin’s answer to such questions is controversial, but the gist is that he dismisses such “meta-ethical” worries as “external” threats. [read post]