Search for: "People v. H & H Properties (1984)"
Results 41 - 55
of 55
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
”[2] G v H (1994) A good starting point in discussing the issue of who is a parent is G v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 5:00 pm
(3) Assault by auto or vessel is a crime of the second degree if serious bodily injury results from the defendant operating the auto or vessel while in violation of R.S.39:4-50 or section 2 of P.L.1981, c.512 (C.39:4-50.4a) while: (a) on any school property used for school purposes which is owned by or leased to any elementary or secondary school or school board, or within 1,000 feet of such school property; (b) driving through a school crossing as defined in R.S.39:1-1 if the… [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
And these were people hellbent on killing and destroying people’s lives. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 4:55 am
In the words of Suffolk County Commercial Division Justice Elizabeth H. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
The lives and property of those who fly had become “a plaything of politics,” he charged. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
" People ex Rel. [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 11:52 am
Spaulding, and Judge William H. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal’s ruling in R. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
The Turtles ongoing tri-state litigation against SiriusXM over the satellite radio broadcaster's refusal to pay to broadcast pre-1972 sound recordings reached the the Florida Supreme Court, who looked again at Judge Darrin Gayle's decision which found in favour of SiriusXM and agreed that "There is no specific Florida legislation covering sound recording property rights, nor is there a bevy of case law interpreting common law copyright related to the arts" and… [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 2:31 am
To put it in perspective, my group at the University of Toronto was working on multi-touchin 1984 (Lee, Buxton & Smith, 1985), the same year that the first Macintosh computer was released, and we were not the first. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
New South Wales District Court Judge Judith Gibson argues the case for reform in a paper she delivered on 29 November 2010 to the Intellectual Property, Media and Communications Law Roundtable held at UTS. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 4:40 am
In Rimini Street, Inc. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:05 pm
(For example, in Telecommunications Research & Action v. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The proposed settlement was entered into under the authority granted EPA in Section 122(h) of CERCLA, and requires the Respondents to pay $600,000.00 to the Hazardous Substances Superfund in settlement of past costs. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 8:43 am
But his administration’s decision on this case, Connecticut v. [read post]
