Search for: "People v. Holden" Results 41 - 59 of 59
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2010, 1:59 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
This faulty reasoning shows up in the district court opinion in Salinger v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
A: Mutilation v. destruction: people do debate which is worse. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 2:10 am by Kelly
Skype blocks Fring, citing ‘misuse’ (ArsTechnica) Australia Holden wins the race in domain name dispute: GM Holden Ltd. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 5:31 am
In 2006, Urban Outfitters alleged that BCBG had infringed its mark "FREE PEOPLE" by their use of "TRUE PEOPLE". [read post]
6 Aug 2009, 7:11 am
One of the news reports about the filing of this brief carries the title College Libraries v. [read post]
14 Jun 2009, 3:16 pm
On June 10, 2009, the Michigan Supreme Court issued its opinion in People v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 4:01 am
Trust gets transactions done and people talking. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
19 Jan 2008, 11:29 pm
I recently updated the article to take into account the decisions in ACCC v Audi and ACCC v Telstra. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 7:08 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]