Search for: "People v. Holmes" Results 41 - 60 of 680
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2019, 6:00 am by Brian Gallini
Datta at first thought Holmes was joking, but later grew concerned as their exchange progressed; she advised Holmes to get help. [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 4:06 am by Bill Araiza
As a follow up to my tongue-in-cheek post last Friday about language from judicial opinions I want to mention something that's bothered me for a while now, and see if people think I'm being over-sensitive: the jocular riffing on Justice Holmes's "Three generations of imbeciles is enough" language from Buck v. [read post]
14 Aug 2022, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Lawrence Solum
 An example of this use of the bad man thought experiment is provided in Justice Souter's opinion in Exxon Shipping Co. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:15 pm by Kim Krawiec
(HT: Lisa Milot)   Related Posts: Taxing Eggs: A Mini-Symposium Taxing Eggs: Introduction to Perez v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 11:50 pm
This is Part Four of my review of Bruce Ackerman's Holmes Lectures, "The Living Constitution," 120 Harv. [read post]
3 May 2011, 7:16 am by Layla Kuhl
In People v Laidler the Court asked the parties to address “whether, for purposes of offense variable 3, Dante Holmes was a victim and, even if Holmes was not a victim, whether the defendant could appropriately be scored 100 points for offense variable 3 on the theory that ‘death result[ed] from the commission of a crime and homicide is not the sentencing offense. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 10:19 am
The real loser in that election, Justice John Paul Stevens said in his dissent in Bush v. [read post]
17 Feb 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Modern originalists are leapfrogging over the Taft era to resurrect an older, anti-Federalist tradition of strict construction and textualism that dates back to Spencer Roane and John Taylor’s response to McCulloch v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:09 am
I suggested that the canon should not only include super-precedents like Brown v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
[On Tuesday, April 4, Georgetown Law devoted a session of its faculty workshop to honoring the publication of The Hughes Court: From Progressivism to Pluralism, 1930-1941 (Cambridge University Press, 2022), a volume in the Oliver Wendell Holmes Devise History of the Supreme Court of the United States, by Mark V. [read post]
2 Feb 2013, 11:33 am by Brian Shiffrin
Flight alone, however, " is insufficient to justify pursuit because an individual has a right "to be let alone" and refuse to respond to police inquiry' " (id., quoting People v Holmes, 81 NY2d 1056, 1058). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:16 am by Christine Corcos
It is no stretch to say that Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes created the modern First Amendment a hundred years ago in his dissent in Schenck v. [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 8:16 am
It is no stretch to say that Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes created the modern First Amendment a hundred years ago in his dissent in Schenck v. [read post]