Search for: "People v. Hopkins" Results 41 - 60 of 360
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
  Further, the Court held that the implication of a term is not dependent on proving the intention of the actual parties, but rather on what notional “reasonable people” in the position of the parties at the time of contracting would have agreed. [read post]
8 Apr 2007, 4:17 am
We ban a lot of people from flying because of that. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 3:44 am by INFORRM
In this two-part post, Emma Linch explores the judgment in Banks v Cadwalladr. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:10 am by Dennis Crouch
So too it can be said about the Supreme Court’s decision in Mayo v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 1:08 pm by INFORRM
” [55] In Blake v Fox [2023] EWCA Civ 1000, the Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal against Justice Nicklin’s meaning judgment for five out of six tweets. [read post]
4 May 2024, 1:25 pm by David Bernstein
Even on school grounds, racist speech can be protected, such as Nazi meetings on school grounds, see National Socialist White People's Party v. [read post]