Search for: "People v. Jenkins" Results 41 - 60 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jul 2011, 4:17 pm by George M. Wallace
Mark Bennett continues to maintain and update a thorough compendium of links to Rakofsky-related posts on his blog, Defending People. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 8:02 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
There are exceptions to that rule, but the courts are not that forgiving.The case is Jenkins v. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 1:06 pm
"Second, Kirk Jenkins (now at H&L), crunches out The California Supreme Court: 2017 By The Numbers, diving into data from last year to see what can be learned. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 5:42 pm by David
Additionally, we are pleased to welcome Jeff Jenkins and Sean Moore as our keynote speakers. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 2:56 am by SHG
In yet another decision demonstrating that a judge whose career was spent prosecuting can show the fortitude to suppress, Brooklyn Justice Mark Dwyer rejected the testimony of NYC Police Officer Robert McNamara, who falsely claimed consent to justify a search of an apartment to locate a weapon.In People v. [read post]
21 Oct 2019, 1:34 am
The core dispute concerned the authorship of the screenplay of the film “Florence Foster Jenkins” about the eponymous American socialite who believed herself to be a talented operatic singer but, in truth, was the polar opposite. [read post]
20 Feb 2020, 7:06 am by Kristen Matteucci
Jenkins also owns Thurgood Marshall: His Speeches, Writings, Arguments, Opinions, and Reminiscences, edited by Mark V. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 4:17 pm by George M. Wallace
Mark Bennett continues to maintain and update a thorough compendium of links to Rakofsky-related posts on his blog, Defending People. [read post]
12 Mar 2007, 12:26 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITTaxation Religious Objector's First, Ninth Amendment Claims Against Paying Taxes for Military Spending Rejected Jenkins v. [read post]
18 May 2017, 4:36 am by Zachary Margulis-Ohnuma
People facing sentencing on child pornography charges would be well advised to carefully consider the arguments presented by the panel in U.S. v. [read post]