Search for: "People v. Kent"
Results 41 - 60
of 574
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2011, 7:29 am
On Monday, July 18 the Environmental Review Tribunal delivered its ruling in Erickson v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 7:29 am
On Monday, July 18 the Environmental Review Tribunal delivered its ruling in Erickson v. [read post]
22 Jan 2008, 4:36 am
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2024, 4:11 am
Without reading the complaint itself, it’s hard to determine whether Northern District of Florida Judge Kent Wetherell was being fair or harsh with pro se plaintiff lawyer Allan Kassenoff. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 3:50 pm
Kent wrote here about Virginia Gov. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am
Briefly: At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger responds to my Plain English preview of Elonis v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:17 am
United States, 539 U.S. 166 (2003) eviscerates Washington v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 8:28 am
In People v. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 5:35 am
Here is the abstract:Dred Scott v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:43 am
” In The National Law Journal, Arthur Bryant argues that, although the Court’s ruling last Term in the class-action case Spokeo v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 1:37 pm
I can only imaging what Kent Scheidegger at Crime & Consequences will think about today's en banc ruling from the Ninth Circuit in Pinholster v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:51 am
"Criminal justice expert Kent Scheidegger predicts that vast numbers of people who commit property crimes, such as car thieves, will no longer be imprisoned—so if you live in California, 'don't bother investing much in a car. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:07 pm
Kent Greenfield is a Professor of Law at Boston College Law School. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:46 pm
That’s law Professor Kent Greenfield’s take in a new article for Democracy. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 4:21 pm
In Ralston v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 1:36 pm
Kent Higgins, et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 1:36 pm
Kent Higgins, et al. v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 9:29 am
See People v. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 4:58 am
Commentary comes from Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences, who observes that if “the defendant is sentenced to death, as people who commit horrible crimes frequently are and should be, the capital appeal defense cult stands ready to say that the trial lawyer was incompetent for taking the path that he did at each fork in the road, regardless of which one he took. [read post]
