Search for: "People v. Laws (1993)" Results 41 - 60 of 1,821
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Mercado, 307 F.3d 1226, 1229 (10th Cir. 2002) (determining that the automobile exception applied to warrantless search of van that was temporarily inoperable due to mechanical problems) and People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 10:49 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ramada Inc., 826 F.Supp. 726 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) (finding that ads featuring actual people Frank and Cindy Marriott and Donald and Sally Hyatt, and stating "Why the Marriotts [Hyatts] Stay at Renaissance," didn't violate the Lanham Act). [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 5:38 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Amy Bowers and Kristen Carpenter have posted their excellent chapter on Lyng from “Indian Law Stories” on SSRN — “Challenging the Narrative of Conquest: The Story of Lyng v. [read post]
11 Nov 2010, 12:33 pm by Christine Hurt
This past week, we covered Section 11 liability in Securities Regulation, and as law students have for decades now, we parsed through Escott v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 11:56 am
In some cases, this can have very important practical implications on the rights of the people involved.In Air Canada v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 1:42 pm by Liisa Speaker
” The Court of Appeals disagreed citing People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 7:18 am by GSU Law Student
Okamoto on June 13, 1967.Thurgood Marshall (June 2, 1908 – January 24, 1993) History often remembers Thoroughgood “Thurgood” Marshall as a focused, articulate man who dedicated his life to the law and the people. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 7:55 am by Aziza Ahmed
When Ruth Bader Ginsburg joined the Supreme Court in 1993, the court had already decided several key abortion cases, including Roe v. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 12:37 am by INFORRM
It is an approach shunned in other jurisdictions; for example in New York law, the newsworthiness of a story is assessed as a whole so that photographs that accompany a newsworthy story – understood in the widest sense to include matters such as lifestyle and fashion – are automatically covered by this exception (Howell v New York Post 81 NY2d 115 (1993), Costlow v Cusimano 34 Ad2d 196 (1970)). [read post]