Search for: "People v. Layman"
Results 41 - 60
of 88
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2017, 10:03 am
How would you describe your job to other people? [read post]
12 Feb 2015, 2:14 pm
Here to lead readers through the case is solicitor and long-time Katfriend Richard Kempner, who explains as follows:In Fresh v Deepend the courts found in favour of Fresh (the people behind the Innocent smoothie brand), in its hotly-contested action as to who owns the copyright in the ‘Dude’ (the stylised face with halo, right), the logo used by Innocent for the past 15 years on all its smoothie bottles. [read post]
9 Jun 2013, 8:13 am
Miri, who like many readers is an IP enthusiast but not a patent specialist, reflects the concerns of many people who find themselves floating in that strange position of being somewhere between a layman and an expert. [read post]
20 Jun 2006, 12:06 am
In layman's terms these are "really rich people" with net worth or income that suggests sophistication and/or higher risk tolerance. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:50 pm
The Exception at Issue In Polselli v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 8:54 am
Another example can be found in the dissenting opinion of Balla v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 5:45 pm
Two are of particular interest to us criminal defense types.Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:15 am
In layman’s terms, pseudolaw is pure nonsense.AVI v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 12:26 pm
J.E.B. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 3:55 am
State v. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:17 am
” Online Policy Grp. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Because it's almost inevitable - rummage through enough documents and emails of enough people (a quarter million or so will do) and eventually you're very likely to discover somebody saying, or doing, or proposing something dumb. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 10:45 pm
A building in layman’s vocabulary would mean a structure for protection from forces of nature, habituated by people or, for the purpose of storage of goods. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 5:16 am
Frye and Hafler v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 7:56 am
What this means, in layman’s terms, is that a company can have sufficient economic connections with a state for that state to be able to tax it even if it lacks any physical presence (people or property) in the state. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 7:00 am
To defend the New Deal, FDR became an evangelist, telling citizens that the Constitution is “a layman’s document, not a lawyer’s contract” and “like the Bible, it ought to be read again and again. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:00 am
” They made policy and they also “exposited” the Constitution and cast themselves as the People’s tribunes, and thus, the Constitution’s principal interpreters. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am
Most lay people do not understand the significance of taking an oath. [read post]
24 Oct 2012, 4:15 am
Realizing that an unaided layman may have little skill in arguing the law or in coping with an intricate procedural system, Powell v. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 3:09 am
While the Supreme Court in Peña-Rodriguez v. [read post]
