Search for: "People v. London" Results 41 - 60 of 1,611
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2007, 10:45 am
Take a look at the filter issue heating up (LibrarianActivist.org) at the London Public Library. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 9:08 pm
As you know, on November 24th, in one of the "John Doe" cases targeting Boston University, consolidated under the heading London-Sire Records v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 10:05 pm
C, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2008] EWHC 1230 (Admin) is, in the end, mainly concerned with education, but there is quite a bit of interest to housing people. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 2:45 am by David Smith
The Mayor of London (Greater London Authority) v Haw & Ors [2011] EWHC 585 (QB) You may remember that there has been some previous litigation (the most crucial of which we reported on here) between the Mayor of London and various persons protesting on or around Parliament Square. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 3:27 am by Matrix Law
It must therefore be assumed that people of modest means are not excluded from benefitting from Nuffield Health’s activities overall, even if they are excluded from the facilities at Merton Abbey gym. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 1:53 pm
R (Van Boolen) v London Borough of Barking & Dagenham [2009] EWHC 2196 (Admin) Last in our series of updates is Boolen v Barking & Dagenham. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 7:03 am by Anthony Fairclough
The London Borough of Haringey could have made up the shortfall in funding, but decided against this. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:25 am by INFORRM
The trial in the case of Johnny Depp v News Group Newspapers in the High Court in London before Nicol J continued on Friday 15 July (Day 9), Monday 20 July (Day 10) and Tuesday 21 July (Day 11). [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:23 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This building is ten stories high and, on its top floor, has a viewing platform which offers panoramic views of London. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
 Critics fear the Tories will now move to cripple Ofcom — and then quietly relax the restrictions on Sky News … THE PRESS GANG campaign — The People v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:45 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
So, it follows that s 189(1)(c) must contemplate homeless people who would be more vulnerable than many others in the same position. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm by David Smith
Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin) On Lawtel but no on BAILII This is an interesting little problem involving the payment of Council Tax. [read post]
15 Apr 2012, 2:08 pm by David Smith
Macattram v Camden London Borough Council (2012) QBD (Admin) On Lawtel but no on BAILII This is an interesting little problem involving the payment of Council Tax. [read post]
9 May 2011, 2:47 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)Bajwa & Ors, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 1093 (06 May 2011) Court of Appeal (Civil Division)TG, R (on the application of) v London Borough of Lambeth [2011] EWCA Civ 526 (06 May 2011) C (A Child), Re [2011] EWCA Civ 521 (06 May 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division)Potts v Densley & Anor [2011] EWHC 1144 (QB) (06 May 2011) Bacon v Automattic Inc & Ors [2011] EWHC 1072 (QB) (06 May 2011)High Court (Chancery… [read post]