Search for: "People v. Lopez"
Results 41 - 60
of 497
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2007, 3:45 am
Lopez-Vanegas. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 11:44 am
So I'm confident that any inference that the company fired people on account of their race is demonstrably false. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 5:31 am
Lopez spent most of this topic talking about the EEOC v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 8:34 am
In McAllen Hospitals LP et al. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 1:24 pm
In a Findlaw column on Lopez Torres, Marci Hamilton revisits California Democratic Party v. [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 2:32 pm
Note also that it is in general accord with People v. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 12:27 pm
Relying primarily on Lopez v. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 11:50 am
As Judge Graber notes, "[i]t is not known who stole the pistol, how many people possessed it in the four days between June 27 and July 1, who took the pistol out of the holster and wrapped it in a shirt or rag (or why they did so), or how the pistol came to be left near the bench where Lopez-Sanchez found it. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 12:47 pm
Something to which I can personally attest, having been held up at gunpoint myself in that fine locale (albeit not at a fast food joint).As far as I -- or anyone else -- can tell, Gilbert Vasquez and his fellow gang members killed Juan Lopez, without word or provocation, solely because they mistakenly thought he was a member of another gang. [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 10:44 am
People v Fenner, 61 NY2d 971, 973, [1984]), the People did not produce the arrest warrant itself prior to the conclusion of the hearing (see Lopez, 206 AD2d at 894; People v McLoyd, 35 Misc 3d 822, 828, 946 N.Y.S.2d 829 [Sup Ct, NY County 2012]). [read post]
25 Sep 2011, 10:41 am
Lopez, 2011 U.S. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 9:40 am
People v. [read post]
6 Sep 2009, 6:53 am
In affirming the conviction, at People v McDaniel (_ NY3d_, 2009 NY Slip Op 06369 [9/1/09]), the Court of Appeals held that Because defense counsel's decision not to seek dismissal of the robbery in the first degree charge for insufficient evidence would not have resulted in a dismissal of that charge (see People v Lopez, 73 NY2d 214, 219-220 [1989]; People v Baskerville, 60 NY2d 374, 380-381 [1983]), defendant's claim of… [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 7:38 am
People v. [read post]
17 Jan 2016, 12:25 pm
Supreme Court in Maryland v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 11:48 pm
For example, overturning Griswold v. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 3:00 pm
(Lopez, Morrison) Hence Congress has no power under the Commerce Clause to require people to wear masks, even if it would promote public health and save the economy. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 5:17 pm
Lopez Torres, attributing the sentiment to Thurgood Marshall. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 4:01 pm
Lopez and U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2008, 2:15 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
