Search for: "People v. Mapp"
Results 41 - 60
of 110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2015, 4:01 pm
See People v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
Defendant's motion to preclude impeachment evidence, People v Sandoval 34 NY2d 371 (1974), and evidence-in-chief of prior bad acts, People v Ventimiglia 52 NY2d 350 (1981), is referred to the trial court for hearings immediately prior to trial. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 9:01 pm
United States), for federal agents, and to 1961 (Mapp v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 8:50 am
Courts can answer the substantive question first when necessary to develop the law and answer the good/bad faith question second.Personally, I would prefer to see Mapp v. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 7:30 am
All Mapp v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 7:56 am
Ken Armstrong of the Marshall Project reports on the passing of Dollree Mapp, the petitioner in Mapp v. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 4:54 am
And said, in Mapp v. [read post]
28 May 2014, 3:56 pm
Oliver Brown fue un personaje secundario, un nombre más entre un grupo de casi doscientos reclamantes que habían sido seleccionados para litigar por la NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People), una organización creada en 1909 para promover los derechos de los negros. [read post]
25 May 2014, 11:08 am
People v Perkins ruled that PL §§ 265.01(1) and 400.00 are constitutional and do not run afoul of Heller. [read post]
21 May 2014, 4:35 pm
Under the Fourth Amendment it is unreasonable to seize evidence unless the evidence was within the plain view of the officer’s sight according to People v Spinelli, 35 NY2d 77 [1974] and the property was recovered as a result of an inventory search. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
He obviously has a perspective of his own on the underlying issues — he was, for instance, a forceful critic of the Court’s Employment Division v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 6:13 am
Canonical cases like Mapp v. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 12:47 pm
The Court’s single most important exclusionary rule decision was probably Mapp v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 8:56 pm
In a recent case known as People v. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:23 pm
Fordyce v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:27 pm
A Mapp hearing was held on 9 September 2009, during which only MM testified. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 5:36 pm
On the consent of the People and pursuant to People v Dunaway, Mapp v Ohio and People v Huntley, a hearing was held in this matter on 19 October 2012. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:25 pm
People v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:46 am
In Massachusetts people enjoy protections as per Art. 14 when they are overnight guests (Commonwealth v. [read post]
