Search for: "People v. Marcus" Results 41 - 60 of 286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2022, 1:11 pm by Will Baude
The first episode, Maoist Takeover, was recorded at William & Mary Law School as part of their Scalia-Ginsburg Collegiality Speaker Series, and focuses on how to engage with people across profound disagreement, as well as on the Supreme Court's shadow-docket decisions in Yeshiva University v YU Pride Alliance. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Justice Department has charged five people for making threats of violence against election workers amid a rising wave of harassment and intimidation tied to the 2020 presidential race, a top official told the Senate Judiciary Committee. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
The appeal was allowed in Law Society of British Columbia v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
IPSO 09326-21 Kennedy v Real People, 1 Accuracy (2019), 4 Intrusion into grief or shock (2019), No breach – after investigation 11214-21 Zaman v The Mail on Sunday, 2 Privacy (2021), No breach – after investigation New Issued Cases There were two defamation (libel and slander) claims filed on the media and communications list last week. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 3:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
From Eleventh Circuit Judge Stanley Marcus's concurrence in Speech First, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
Marcus Rediker's fifteen tips on publishing.Banned books? [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am by Sherry F. Colb
Ruth Marcus says that Donald Trump liked Gorsuch very much because he looked like a judge. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
” Inforrm had an article on the new phenomenon of the “TikTok Tabloid,” which sets out how digital technologies are enabling a new form of social surveillance, and the impact this has on people’s private lives. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
You think you can prevent my candidate from joining the Court and reversing Roe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 4:59 am by David Oscar Markus
Maybe conservative activists have no burning desire to overrule Obergefell v. [read post]