Search for: "People v. Marks"
Results 41 - 60
of 8,179
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2020, 2:10 am
In this regard, the Court reasoned as follows:First, jurisprudence suggesting that the mental state of an alleged infringer was irrelevant usually concerned – people who did not know that the goods (containing the infringing sign) that they were selling or otherwise handling were not genuine from the trade mark proprietor rather than those who did not even know that a sign identical or similar to the trade mark existed on the goods at all. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 3:01 am
A case in point is that of the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), an organisation established to ensure the creation of an ‘Igbo nation’ comprising of the citizens of Biafra. [read post]
22 Nov 2017, 12:41 am
The few people that may have heard of it (i.e. people who live near the mountain pass) are not the average consumer and not located in the EU. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 6:46 pm
What most people will take away from Harris v. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 2:52 am
The latter was seen as referring to people of an Oriental descent. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 4:30 am
The Case is C-46/10 Viking Gas A/S v Kosan Gas A/S, formerly BP Gas A/S, a reference for a preliminary ruling under from the Danish Højesteret [the IPKat interjects to add that, since the Danes are so good at speaking other languages, it is easy to forget that they speak Danish too: Højesteret is the Danish for 'Supreme Court' and is not, as Merpel mischievously tells people, a tasty dessert]. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 7:27 am
A group of people has started to file applications of US trade marks, including some very famous ones. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 12:46 pm
In a major victory for marijuana rights in California, the state supreme court has declined to hear an appeal from prosecutors on the overturned conviction of a marijuana collective operator in People v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:52 am
Sukumar v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 12:32 pm
” But sometimes Marks is difficult to apply; Baze v. [read post]
4 Dec 2009, 2:23 pm
In Forest Grove School Dist. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:12 pm
Or anyone else's, for that matter.Including but not limited to "kites" that aren't intended for me and that are marked "Do Not Read. [read post]
1 Sep 2008, 1:51 am
Dennis Kozlowski and People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 1:29 pm
The Bible says that God punished Cain by placing a mark upon him "lest anyone finding him shall kill him," and Cain was banished to the land of Nod.Now Abel gets into the act. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:41 am
Mark Bennett, before the Georgia Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 2:31 pm
Matal v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 12:20 pm
Rothschild, Case No. 1:22-cv-00384, related to trade mark infringement and the sale of NFTs of “MetaBirkins” -pending: motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint denied-; Nike, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 1:06 am
Sometimes it smells, sometimes it is just unpleasant and people many times associate dog food with bad food. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 6:00 am
In Wickard v. [read post]
11 Aug 2008, 3:09 pm
Too much protection for the distinctiveness of shape marks, or even against people taking advantage of earlier shape marks could lead to an earlier user managing to control the market for a type of product, or at least a particular genre of product-type (such as the retro food mixers). [read post]
