Search for: "People v. Marques"
Results 41 - 60
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2012, 5:17 am
There has been plenty of activity on the MARQUES Class 46 weblog this week. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:42 pm
This case is Flava Works, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 4:11 am
60/10 Jackson International Trading Co v OHIM When companies like Jackson Trading Co. [read post]
8 May 2012, 8:43 am
Then Rosetta Stone v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 9:49 am
The case, Flava Works, Inc v. [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:57 am
The MARQUES Class 46 blog is now back online after its hosts did some seasonal spring-cleaning on their website: sorry about the inconvenience! [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 8:17 am
MARQUES news. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:52 am
And the use, as evidence in a criminal proceeding, of facts ascertained by such intrusion must be deemed a violation of the Fifth.I'm always saddened by the fact that Brandeis wrote that ringing paragraph not for the Court in Olmstead v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
So many people have been emailing the IPKat to ask him if he has seen yesterday's General Court decision in Case T-332/10 Viaguara v OHIM - Pfizer (VIAGUARA) that he's beginning to worry if they are trying to tell him something. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 8:27 pm
Bringing up the tail is SOLO IP, which reflects some of the interests, and the anguish, of those who practise IP by themselves or in small groups, or who work in environments in which they are the only IP people (http://soloip.blogspot.com/). [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Viacom v. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 6:47 am
Some naughty people haven't responded to their invitations yet, so they are asked politely to do so. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:40 pm
MARQUES works very hard to improve the environment in which trade marks are secured, protected and successfully used in Europe and it's good to see that so many people are making use of its information and education services; PatLit, which focuses solely -- as the name suggests -- on patent litigation, now has its 900th email subscriber. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:03 pm
According to the very handy, and indeed swiftly-posted, note on the MARQUES Class 46 blog by the lovely, learned and and indeed alliterative Laetitia Lagarde, the General Court upheld the OHIM Board of Appeal's refusal to register the word mark PAKI for various goods and services in Classes 6, 20, 37 and 39. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 2:35 am
The Court has identified four by name, but it was reported last week in the MARQUES conference that up to 17 have been identified] of the trade mark. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:17 am
Cubatabaco v. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 5:01 am
That's very gratifying when we consider that every one of these people is or was sufficiently interested in IP to want to receive news of all its posts. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 12:10 pm
The jiplp weblog carries a pre-publication chance to read the Current Intelligence notes of Joel Smith and Joanna Silver (Herbert Smith LLP) on L'Oréal SA v eBay International and of fellow Kat Matt Fisher (UCL) on Albert Packaging v Nampak. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 10:47 am
The MARQUES Class 46 blog announces the publication of the latest revision of Providers of Warning Information -- which gives further details of how national and international IP Offices advise users of scams and unsolicited requests for payments. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 1:50 am
Today the MARQUES Class 46 weblog posted the most recent update of its little guide to the practice of IP offices regarding the receipt by users of their patent and trade mark systems of apparently official requests for payments. [read post]
