Search for: "People v. Morales" Results 41 - 60 of 4,192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Apr 2008, 11:14 am
Although I have always intellectually understood the "lingering doubt" instruction (i.e., that there may still be some doubt about the defendant's guilt even though you're morally certain that he committed the offense), I've never actually felt it. [read post]
22 Feb 2010, 12:30 pm by David Kopel
The Amendment was added by the Irish people in order to prevent the judicial creation of a right to abortion, as in Roe v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:27 pm
I'm fine to let a jury decide.But it is my firm opinion that the relevant people in the Santa Clark County Sheriff's Office belong behind bars.Here's the basic scoop:"The Penal Code authorizes, but does not require, county sheriffs to issue licenses to carry concealed weapons to applicants who are of good moral character, have good cause for a license, reside or work in the county, and have completed a specified course of training. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 7:17 am by stu@crimapp.com
Supreme Court finding in Graham v Florida that people can change, you’d think that agencies would recognize the same. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 2:35 pm
In the area of legal ethics, offenses involving moral turpitude — such as fraud or breach of trust — traditionally make a person unfit to practice law. [3]People v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:07 pm
So after he testifies, the prosecutor asks the defendant: "You were convicted in 2003 of a felony involving moral turpitude, right? [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 8:22 pm
 But the fewer people who are bound by the ruling, the fewer people have standing to appeal. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 5:11 am by Sherry F. Colb
I refer instead to the wish to avoid moral complicity that excuses people from having to abide by a law or rule or expectation that applies to them. [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 10:04 am by Jeff Gamso
  (Hell, this post is Part V in a series with that title.) [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 7:39 am
 Moral outrage against human slavery, for example, required people to identify with the slave's experience and, to some degree, to "feel her pain. [read post]
2 Jul 2022, 5:21 am by SHG
If they comport with transitory popularity, nothing more matters, and New York at a state does not want people carrying guns. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 4:20 am
The moral stakes are simply too high -- both for the innocent people wasting away on death row and for the society that put them there. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 7:55 am
  John Gleeson has a moral compass. [read post]