Search for: "People v. Neuberger"
Results 41 - 60
of 163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2016, 2:20 am
Lord Neuberger gave the only judgment. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 4:43 am
Ruling in favour of the firm in Simcoe v Jacuzzi UK Group Neuberger said that “something is out of kilter” when the firm had managed to amass costs of £75,000 when its client, plumber Adrian Simcoe, had received a £12,500 settlement for a personal injury claim. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 11:20 am
Lord Neuberger also talked of his concerns about the legal aid cuts. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:30 am
NGN is entitled to publish articles criticising people in the public eye. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:15 am
Lord Neuberger, the Master of the Rolls, said that “there can be no doubt that the defendants should have the right to express the views which they wish to express; similarly, there is no doubt that they should enjoy the right to assemble together. [read post]
13 May 2015, 2:09 am
This was a point of appeal from Kanu v Southwark (our report). [read post]
1 Jan 2016, 1:13 pm
For an example of the Upper Tribunal interpreting Lord Neuberger’s principles, see our report here. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:30 am
As Lord Neuberger explained, the assessment of what is an “ordinary homeless person” was more likely to lead to “arbitrary and unpredictable outcomes” and to result in support being denied to very needy people ([56]). [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm
What got me through land law as a student was Gray and Symes’ textbook, Real Property and Real People. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:52 am
It held that for this purpose it is not sufficient that people resident in the jurisdiction may be customers of the claimant when they go abroad, although it could be enough if people in the jurisdiction obtain the right to receive a claimant’s services abroad by booking with, or purchasing from, an entity in this country, even if that entity is not part of the claimant. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
Not least because I get to use the word 'Snook' without people pointing at me and laughing. [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 1:25 pm
Not least because I get to use the word 'Snook' without people pointing at me and laughing. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
There may be further additions and comments as people get a chance/have a brainwave. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He is arguing that it would be unconstitutional to withdraw from the EU without the consent of the people of Northern Ireland for the following two reasons: Membership of EU part of the constitutional settlement There has been transfer of sovereignty which means that the people of Northern Ireland have sovereignty over constitutional change rather than Parliament. 15:00: Scoffield QC submits that a constitutional convention may be a constitutional rule – this is… [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Lord Neuberger remarks: “It bears repeating that we are not being asked to overturn the result of the EU Referendum. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 7:34 am
The majority (Lords Neuberger, Toulson, Reed and Sumption) held that it was not reasonable to expect a more peremptory notice. [read post]
21 May 2011, 5:53 am
One was set aside on appeal (Ntuli v Donald [2010] EWCA Civ 1276). [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 2:43 am
The dissent is notable, if only for the fact the President of the court, Lord Neuberger, and Lord Sumption are the two dissenters. [read post]
