Search for: "People v. Price (1986)"
Results 41 - 60
of 161
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2021, 9:05 pm
In 1986, U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2007, 1:57 am
People living in areas with skyrocketing prices pay taxes that are a lower percentage of the property's actual value than do people who live in areas with declining or stagnating values. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 5:51 am
[quoting West Virginia v. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 9:52 am
In FTC v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:00 pm
People ex rel. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
The Court saw the license denial as an effort by New York to horde a resource and thereby keep prices for its consumers low.Edwards v California (1941) considered a challenge to a California law aimed at reducing the influx of dustbowl indigents to the state. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
In NFL v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 7:00 pm
In NFL v. [read post]
1 Feb 2014, 6:43 pm
In NFL v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
First, in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:56 am
In 1986, the False Claims Act was amended to raise the total compensation given to people who reported fraudulent actions, or whistleblowers. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Few people can afford to pay an attorney for the years that a lawsuit often takes to get resolved. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 2:00 pm
Then on June 9, in Williams v. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Aug. 21, 2013) (“[t]he price of more detailed warnings is greater than their printing fees; it also takes into account whether additional details will undermine the effectiveness of warnings altogether”); Stanley v. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:07 pm
" The panel cited the Supreme Court's decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 8:46 am
(Unocal Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 9:15 am
The Court first announced the test in a Sherman Act case in 1986. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 5:04 pm
492 So. 2d 750 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1986). [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:26 am
The builder puts in 3.5% of the sale price and the government puts in "additional security for the loan in the form of a guarantee" (para 20). 100,000 households will be supported through this scheme. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 8:26 am
The builder puts in 3.5% of the sale price and the government puts in "additional security for the loan in the form of a guarantee" (para 20). 100,000 households will be supported through this scheme. [read post]
