Search for: "People v. Sans"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,215
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Pott v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 6:02 am
” The US Supreme Court opined about the lack of jury diversity as early as 1940 in Smith v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm
In People v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 2:44 pm
(Though, as everyone knows, the line between permissible and "impermissible" testimony in this regard is definitely a fine one.)The Court of Appeal concludes that the officer's testimony in this case (out of San Diego) is more in the second bucket than the first, so reverses the conviction and remands for a new trial. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 11:47 am
Since 1992, our personal injury attorneys at the Pines Salomon Injury Lawyers, APC. have been fighting for the people of San Diego. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 6:30 am
Ct. 1731, 1755 (2020) (Alito, J., dissenting) (statutory words “mean what they conveyed to reasonable people at the time they were written” (citation omitted)); Kisor v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:05 pm
People v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
The highest number was 3551 cases in the Southern District of Texas (think Corpus Christi) and 2646 in the Western District of Texas (think San Antonio). [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 7:00 am
Supreme Court agreed to review Johnson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 10:34 am
Many people think this is true. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am
City and County of San Francisco (1st—A165231) Workers’ Compensation Exclusive Remedy Rule—Public Employers—Court of Appeal, affirming trial court’s judgment of dismissal in favor of defendants, held that plaintiff firefighter employed by San Francisco Fire Department (SFFD) was barred by workers’ compensation exclusive remedy rule in Labor Code §§ 3600(a), 3601(a) and 3602(a) from pursuing personal injury claim against… Yalung… [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 11:07 am
In California, for example, we have PG&E, Southern California Edison, San Diego Gas and Electric, L. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
This post comes to us from Sonam Singh at the University of Texas at San Antonio’s Alvarez College of Business, Ashwin V. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:20 am
Hosp. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
"); Riley Gaines Assaulted by Trans Activists at San Francisco State University, Yahoo News (describing how prote [read post]
13 Jan 2024, 7:24 am
"San Francisco, which spent over $672 million during the last fiscal year to provide shelter and housing to people experiencing homelessness, told the justices in a 'friend of the court' brief that its inability to enforce its own laws 'has made it more difficult to provide services' to those people.... [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Is that the case in San Francisco? [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 12:23 pm
In Martin v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 5:37 pm
If you are facing criminal charges, contact our San Diego office today for a confidential consultation. [read post]
